检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张一[1]
机构地区:[1]美国丹佛大学
出 处:《科技和产业》2014年第1期102-107,共6页Science Technology and Industry
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71102170)
摘 要:创新是国家竞争优势和企业持续发展的关键。我国企业自主创新能力薄弱已经成当前经济可持续发展的桎梏。为探讨创新模式对企业绩效的影响,本文比较分析了开放式创新和封闭式创新的特征以及差异性;在此基础上,基于博弈理论,构建企业、竞争企业、客户三方参与的封闭式创新模型、半开放式创新模型与开放式创新模型。通过对四个模型的求解和对比分析得出:企业绩效和企业创新的开放式程度成正比,即开放式创新企业绩效大于半开放式创新企业绩效;半开放式创新企业绩效大于封闭式创新企业绩效。Innovation is key to advantage in national competition and continuing development of enterprises. The weakness of independent innova- tion capacity of Chinese enterprises shackles the continuing development of economy. To discuss the influence of innovation mode to enterprises' performance, this article compared and analyzed the character and difference of open innovation and close innovation. Furthermore, base on the Game theory, constructed different modes of close innovation, semi-open innovation and open innovation which participated by enterprises, com- petitors and customers. By comparing and analyzing the above innovation modes to educe that the performance of enterprise is in direct ratio with the extent of open innovation. It means that the performance of open innovation enterprises is better than the ones who has semi-open innovation, and the performance of semi-open innovation enterprises is better than the ones who has close innovation.
分 类 号:F062.4[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15