检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期58-63,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费青年教师科研创新基金资助项目(N110414002);东北大学"985工程"科技与社会(STS)哲学社会科学创新基地资助项目
摘 要:地方政府对网络舆论监督的回应基本属于"实用主义回应"。从治理转型的视角看,地方政府对网络舆论监督实用主义回应的政治价值在于其有利于政府与民众的"互训",但其具有明显的过渡性,能否良性、渐进、彻底地持续进行下去,取决于宏观制度供给的改变。视宏观制度供给的情况,地方政府对网络舆论监督实用主义回应既有可能滑向机会主义和鸵鸟主义,在制度性漠视和个案选择性回应之间徘徊,也有可能从维稳驱动型回应转为权利驱动型回应,从实用主义的个案回应转到系统的制度性回应。Local governments' response to internet-based public supervision is basically pragmatic. From the perspective of governance transformation, the political implication of pragmatic response is mutual discipline which benefits both the government and the public. However, it is transitional by nature, and whether this sort of practice can survive and work well depends on the reforms of macro institutional supplies, based on which pragmatic response might slip into political opportunism and escapism lingering between institutional indifference and selected response to single cases, or upgrade itself from the stability holding type to the interest-driven type and from pragmatic selected response to systematic institutional response.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70