检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚刃韧[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《比较法研究》2014年第1期1-21,共21页Journal of Comparative Law
摘 要:在人类历史上,酷刑曾长期是各国司法制度中合法的手段。近代以后人类才开始在法律上废除酷刑的漫长进程。其中,17世纪英格兰终止刑讯具有先驱意义。18、19世纪欧洲大陆国家相继废除了酷刑。西方国家废除酷刑对一些东方国家也产生了影响。第二次世界大战以后,禁止酷刑不仅为国际条约所规定,而且已成为国际习惯法和强行法规则。在当今国际社会酷刑已成为公认的罪行。然而,酷刑作为人类社会的一种制度顽疾,在法律上废除并不等于在事实上根除。In the history of human, torture had been the legitimate means in judicial system of the most countries. Just until the modern time human began a long process of abolishing torture under law. England stopped using torture for extortion of confession in the 17th century which had the model signifi- cance. European continental countries abolished torture successively during thelSth and the 19th centu- ries. The fact of abolishing torture in western countries had an impact on some eastern countries too. Af- ter World War II, prohibition of torture has been not only provided by international treaties, and also has become a rule of customary law and jus congens. Nowadays, torture has been regarded as acknowledged crimes in international society. However, as an institutional chronic and stubborn disease, legally abol- ished torture is not equal to eradication of it in practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74