论正犯与共犯的区分——立足于我国刑法规定之检讨  

On the Distinctions between Principal and Accomplice:Based on the Rules in China's Criminal Law

作　　者：吴飞飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家检察官学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2014年第1期76-86,共11页Journal of Comparative Law

摘　　要：基于正犯理论的实质化演进,现在通行于大陆法系国家关于共犯分类标准的分工分类法已经大异其趣,这种修正了的分工分类法试图在分工中解决不同类型共犯人刑事责任的大小问题而更接近于我国的作用分类法。我国目前共犯分类理论应当将分工分类法与作用分类法相结合,发挥各分类法的应有功能,做到对共犯人准确定罪量刑。我国目前坚持正犯判断标准形式的客观说并对其适当修正更为现实和可行。在此基础上我国刑法中正犯与实行犯几乎可以合一把握。Due to the substantial evolution of principle theory, work - division classification, the classification criteria of Accomplice used in continental countries, has been revised a lot. This revised classification tries to determine the criminal responsibility of different types of accomplices by work divi- sion and is much like the function classification in China. The function classification theory in China should integrate work - division and function classification; besides, it should bring each into play to convict and measure penalty correctly. According to the theory study and judicial practice nowadays, as to the principal criteria, it＇ s more realistic and feasible to adopt the doctrine of formal objectiveness and revise slightly. Based on this, we can identify principal with perpetrator.

关 键 词：分工分类法 作用分类法 形式的客观说 正犯 实行犯 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]