检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何旭波[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第12期1-8,157,共8页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:运用MARKAL能源系统模型对陕西省2010—2030年的能源生产、主要大气污染物及二氧化碳排放进行模拟后发现:(1)污染物排放限制和可再生能源生产补贴政策在促进可再生能源生产的同时会减少煤和石油的生产速度;(2)可再生能源生产补贴政策对天然气、核电和水电的生产影响不大;(3)污染物排放限制和可再生能源生产补贴政策会"反转"主要污染物的排放趋势;(4)污染物排放限制和可再生能源生产补贴政策均能减少陕西省未来的二氧化碳排放,但排放限制的减排作用要强于补贴政策。This paper used IEA's energy system model MARKAL to predict energy production, CO 2 and emissions of main atmospheric pollutants such as SO 2 、CO、NO x in Shaanxi province from 2010 to 2030. After establishing kinds of simula- tion scenarios about production subsidies for re- newable energy and emission limit of main atmos- pheric pollutants,we analyzed and compared dif- ferent simulation results under these scenarios. Some important conclusions were achieved. First, emission limit and subsidy policies can not only promote production of renewable energy but also reduce the rate of production of coal and oil. Sec- ond,subsidy policies have limit impacts on natural gas,nuclear power and hydropower. Third,emis- sion limit and subsidy policies will reverse the trends of main pollutant emissions. Four,emission limit of main atmospheric was more powerful in CO 2 reduction than subsidy policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222