香港特区与澳门特区民事司法协助模式的突破与缺憾——兼评《关于香港特区与澳门特区相互认可和执行仲裁裁决的安排》  

Breakthrough and Flaw of Civil Judicial Assistance Mode between Hong kong and Macao

作　　者：张淑钿[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第12期66-73,158,共8页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目<特别行政区制度在我国国家管理体制中的地位和作用研究>(批准号:10JZD0034-2)

摘　　要：《香港特区与澳门特区相互认可和执行仲裁裁决的安排》作为港澳特区间首个民事司法协助安排,延续采用我国区际民事司法协助的安排模式,回应了有关区际司法协助模式的理论争议,明确了特区间民事司法协助的法律依据和协商主体,完善了生效程序,并进一步表明特区间开展民事司法协助事项属于特区的高度自治权。但是,该模式也存在一定的缺憾,包括安排性质的模糊性、达成和生效过程效率较低、签订主体与批准生效主体不一致可能存在的安排能否通过以及能否原样通过的风险、中央对安排内容是否违反基本法审查权的滞后性等。The Arrangement Concerning Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Between the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macao Special Administrative Re- gion,as the first arrangement of civil judicial assis- tance between Hongkong and Macao,takes the mode of arrangement applied to interregional civil judicial assistance. It respondes the theoretical dis- cusses,comfirmes the legel basis and consulting subject,makes the effective procedure perfect,and manifestes the right to sign civil judicial assistance between special regions which belonging to high degree of autonomy of special region. However, there are some flaws: fuzziness of nature of ar- rangement,inefficiency of sign,risk of origin pas- sage of legislation,lag of the power to review ac- corrding to the Basic law of central authorities.

关 键 词：区际民事司法协助 安排模式 承认和执行仲裁裁决 香港澳门 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]