检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李浩[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200063
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2013年第6期24-31,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College
基 金:2010年国家社科基金课题一般项目<近年金融领域刑事司法状态的实证研究>;项目编号:10BFX042
摘 要:近年来内幕交易案件频发,无论是"杭萧钢构案"还是"上海组龙内幕交易案"都在司法认定方面引起了理论和实务界的较大争议。这充分表明,在认定内幕交易罪的司法实践中仍然存在很多待解的难题。只有在对这些司法难题进行深入剖析的基础上,重构内幕信息的认定标准、改善内幕交易行为的取证路径、强化内幕交易的执法力度、完善机制设计,才能破解司法难题,维护证券市场的公平公正,保障证券法律法规得以遵守和执行。In recent years, insider trading cases become more frequent, whether the "Hangxiao Steel Structure case" or the "Shanghai Zulong insider trading case", has both aroused great controversy concerning on judicature cognizance in both the theoretical and practical fields. It fully demonstrates that there are many problems about insider trading in the judicial practice, which we should handle in the future. Only by basing on the in-depth analysis of these judicial problems, reconstructing the standard that judges insider information, improving the forensics path of insider trading, enhancing the insider trading enforcement, and promoting the mechanism design can we deal with the judicial problems, protect the justice in the securities market as well as ensure the securities laws to be complied with and enforced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222