恒速压汞法与常规压汞法优越性比较  被引量:12

Comparing the Constant-speed Mercury Injection Technique with the Conventional Mercury Injection Technique

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈蒲礼[1] 王烁[2] 王丹[1] 贾星亮[1] 潜欢欢[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国石化西北油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆乌鲁木齐830011 [2]中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院,湖北武汉430074

出  处:《新疆地质》2013年第B12期139-141,共3页Xinjiang Geology

摘  要:本文从理论模型、实验过程和测量结果等方面阐述恒速压汞法与常规压汞法的异同。恒速压汞法可区分孔隙和喉道,常规压汞法区不能;恒速压汞法可反映喉道与孔隙的数量分布情况。运用恒速压汞法可获得总体毛管压力曲线、孔隙毛管压力曲线及喉道毛管压力曲线,测试所得到的毛细管压力值及喉道半径值更接近真实情况。This paper profoundly expounded the difference between constant-speed mercury injection and conventional mercury injection technique in the theoretical model,experiment and measurement results.The pore and throat can be dis-tinguished by constant-speed mercury injection technique,but the conventional mercury injection technique is unable to distinguish the pore and throat.The constant-speed mercury injection technique can reflect the distribution of throat and pore.General capillary pressure curve,pore capillary pressure curve and throat capillary pressure cure can be obtained by using Constant-speed mercury injection technique.The obtained capillary pressure and the obtained throat radius is clos-er to the real situation.Constant-speed mercury injection technique is a good method to study rock pore structure.

关 键 词:孔隙结构 恒速压汞 常规压汞 喉道 

分 类 号:P585[天文地球—岩石学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象