检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林柏
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2014年第2期196-197,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的探讨中西医结合治疗泌尿系结石的临床疗效。方法将152例泌尿系结石患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各76例,对照组单纯采用西医常规疗法,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上给予通淋排石汤加减,10 d为1个疗程。比较治疗前后B超和腹部X射线片检查泌尿系结石的变化。结果治疗20 d后,治疗组总有效率为97.4%(74/76),对照组为84.2%(64/76),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.35,P<0.05)。结论中西医结合治疗泌尿系结石临床疗效肯定,且费用少,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of combination of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and West ern medicine (WM) in treating urinary calculus. Methods 152 cases of urinary calculus were randomly divided into treatment group and control group ,76 cases in each group. The control group employed routine WM therapy ,while the treatment group was added with Tonglin Paishi Decoction on the basis of treatment group, 10 days as a course. The changes of urinary calculus by type- B ultrasound and KUB before and after treatment were compared. Results 20 days after treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group and the control group was 97.4% (74/76) and 84.2% (64/76) respectively,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (x^2=9.35 ,P〈0.05). Conclusion Combination of TCM and WM has definite efficacy in treating urinary calculus with less cost, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15