检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国刑警学院法律教研部,辽宁沈阳110854 [2]辽宁公安司法管理干部学院法律系,辽宁沈阳110161
出 处:《辽宁警专学报》2014年第1期30-33,共4页Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
基 金:公安部公安理论及软科学研究项目"刑事警察权能适度扩张的立法调整与实施机制研究"(2011LLYJXJXY079)阶段性研究成果之一
摘 要:2012年修正后的刑事诉讼法关于侦查程序的修改,呈现出明显的扩权基础上限权的指导思想。遗憾的是,立法虽然将辨认笔录增加为证据种类,但产生辨认结果的辨认行为在侦查一章中却难觅踪影,这显然既阻碍了辨认措施功能的充分实现,也不利于规范辨认这一侦查行为。因此,有必要进一步明确辨认的法律地位,完善辨认规则,细化辨认程序。The new Criminal Procedure Law revised in 2012 made some changes about the investigation procedure and showed the guiding principle of limiting power on the basis of power expansion. Unfortunately, although legislation has included transcripts identification as a kind of evidence, the identification behavior that produces identification results is not specified in the chapter of criminal investigation. Obviously, this situation not only hinders the full realization of the function of identification measures, but is also unfavorable for the regulation of such investigation behavior as identification. Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the legal status of identification, to improve identification rules, and to refine identification procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117