对中医科学性及其相关争议的几点认识  

Understanding about the scientificity and related dispute of TCM

作　　者：高辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省绵阳市骨科医院,绵阳621000

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2014年第1期31-34,共4页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：由于中西方之间存在文化差异,以及人们受教育的程度和方式的不同,一部分人对中医的科学性产生了质疑,甚至引起争议,这对中医的发展带来了极大的负面性。文章从中医的产生、科学的定义对其进行分析,阐明中医学是融自然科学与人文社会科学为一体的知识体系,其科学性是可以肯定的,尽管还存在很多不足,但不能成为否定的理由。同时从东西方两种文化思维的起源与背景入手,分析了中西医两种医学体系的区别与共性。并对当下常见的几个有关中医争议问题从中西医结合角度来探讨分析,试图解答争议者的这些困惑,或与同道共勉,并提醒现代人对中医学应多一些包容或改变一下思维方式,以望促进中医学不断向前发展。Scientificity of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） has been questioned, and even disputed because of differences between chinese and western cultures as well as the different degree and ways people educated,which leads to some negative effects about the development of TCM. The author discusses the question in terms of production of TCM and the definition of science, and clarifies TCM to be the combination of natural and social science as a whole knowledge system, whose scientific nature is for sure. Though there are still many problems, they cannot become the reasons of denying the existence of TCM. Meanwhile, the author analyses the differences and similarities between traditional Chinese and western medicine from the point of the two culture thinking origin and background. Moreover, the author discusses several common debated questions about TCM from the angle of combination of traditional Chinese and western medicine, and tries to answer the controversy of these puzzles, or share with our colleagues. It is advised that people should tolerate TCM and change their way of thinking in order to promote the continuous development of TCM.

关 键 词：中医 科学性 争议 

分 类 号：R2-05[医药卫生—中医学]