检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药》2014年第1期111-113,共3页China Medicine
基 金:基金项目:河北省科技计划项目(112761159)
摘 要:目的评价臭氧溶液治疗阴道炎的有效性和安全性。方法将795例各类阴道炎患者按随机数字表随机分为臭氧治疗组(405例)和对照组(390例)。臭氧治疗组采用7mg/L的臭氧水溶液擦洗外阴、阴道黏膜,隔日1次,治疗7d。对照组给予常规药液擦洗。根据治疗前后临床症状、体征和实验室检查的变化判断疗效。结果臭氧治疗组和对照组总有效率差异无统计学意义[92.9%(376/405)比91.5%(357/390),P〉0.05],但臭氧治疗组临床治愈率明显高于对照组[79.8%(323/405)比69.7%(283/390),P〈0.05],且在临床治愈的患者中复发率明显低于对照组[13.9%(45/323)比23.9%(35/272),P〈0.05]。2组均未见严重不良反应。结论臭氧溶液治疗阴道炎不失为一种安全、有效的途径。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of ozone on vaginitis. Methods Totally 813 vaginitis patients were divided into ozone group and control group randomly. In the ozone group, 7 mg/L ozone solution was used to wash the vaginal and vulval mucosa qod for 7 days. On the other hand, control group was treated with regular drugs. Symptomatology and lab test were applied to evaluate the effect. Results There were no significant differences in total cure ratio between ozone group and control group[92.9% (376/405) vs 91.5% (357/ 390) ,P 〉0.05 ], but the clinically cure ratio in ozone group was higher than that in the control group[79.8% ( 323/405 ) vs 69.7 % ( 283/390 ), P 〈 0.05 ], and the rate of recurrence was lower in ozone group [ 13.9 % ( 45/ 323) vs 23.9% (65/272) ,P〈0.05]. Conclusion Ozone is effective and safe treating vaginitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49