检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周广超[1,2] 张栋华[3] 陈武[4] 孙超[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学口腔医学研究所 [2]南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔放射科,南京210029 [3]南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科,南京210029 [4]南京医科大学附属口腔医院牙周科,南京210029
出 处:《口腔医学》2013年第12期810-812,841,共4页Stomatology
基 金:江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(2011137)
摘 要:目的评价锥形束CT(CBCT)对牙根纵裂(VRF)的临床诊断价值。方法对61例患者的67颗临床检查怀疑为VRF的患牙拍摄根尖X线片和CBCT,然后对所有患牙进行根尖切除、牙周翻瓣或拔除等外科手术,以确诊VRF是否存在。将根尖X线片和CBCT影像对VRF的诊断结果与外科手术结果进行比较和统计分析。结果外科手术证实62颗患牙VRF明确存在。CBCT诊断VRF的阳性检出率、灵敏度和准确度分别为83.6%、90.3%和91.0%,而根尖X线片为31.3%、33.9%和38.8%(P<0.01)。CBCT诊断颊舌向和近远中向VRF的灵敏度分别为93.2%和62.5%,高于根尖X线牙片的69.6%和12.8%(P<0.05)。结论 CBCT比根尖X线片更准确地诊断VRF。Objective To evaluate the value of cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRF). Methods Sixty-seven teeth suspected of VRF from 61 patients underwent periapical radiograph(PR) and CBCT. Then all sub- jects underwent surgical operation and direct visualization to confirm the presence or absence of VRF. The results were compared and ana- lyzed statistically. Results Surgical operations confirmed the presence of VRF in 62 teeth. The positive rate,sensitivity and accuracy of VRF according to CBCT were 83.6% ,90.3% and 91.0% respectively,while those of PR were 31.3% ,33.9% and 38.8% ,respectively (P 〈0.01 ). The sensitivity of CBCT for VRF in buccolingnal and mesiodistal direction were 93.2% and 62.5% ,which were higher than those of PR(69.6% and 12.8% ) (P 〈0.05). Conclusions CBCT appears to be more accurate than PR in the diagnosis of VRF.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40