检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包智明[1]
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学民族学系
出 处:《世界民族》1997年第3期40-50,共11页Journal of World Peoples Studies
摘 要:在民族学研究领域里,存在两种不同的跨文化比较研究:广义的和狭义的跨文化比较研究。本文重点探讨了默多克等人创立的(狭义的)跨文化比较研究法。本文不但论述了这种方法在资料运用和分析方法方面的特点,而且指出了它在方法论上存在的若干问题。本文认为,尽管默多克等人为了完善这种方法进行了诸多的努力,但仍然没有能够从根本上解决在方法论上遇到的难题,因而这种方法并没有能够发展为被民族学家普遍运用的主流方法。There are two different sorts of cross- cultrual comparative researches in the field of ethnological studies: those in broad sense and those in narrow sense. This article focuses attention on the methodology of cross - cultural comparison(in narrow sense) created by G. P. Murdock et al. , while expounding the methodology' s features in using materials amd in analysis. The article also points out that there are still several methodological problems in Murdock' s researches. The author holds that Murdock et al. have made a lot of efforts for inproving such a methodology, but they have not settled the difficult methodological methodology has not so far become the ethnologists. problem once and for all,and thetefore their mainstream method generally adopted by
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222