检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪永伟[1,2] 刘育楠[1,2] 赵荣彩[1] 司成[1,2] 邱卫[1,2]
机构地区:[1]信息工程大学,郑州450004 [2]河南省信息安全重点实验室,郑州450004
出 处:《计算机应用》2014年第2期491-495,共5页journal of Computer Applications
基 金:国家863计划项目(2012AA012704);国家973计划项目(2011CB311801)
摘 要:证据理论是实现基于规则的态势感知主要方法之一。然而,证据理论在多源多证据合成时存在悖论问题。针对此问题,通过相异度计算对证据重要性度量与修正,提出了一种基于改进证据理论的态势评估方法,该方法包括规则度量、证据修正、规则融合和态势决策等四个阶段。实验表明,该方法能够避免利用证据理论进行态势融合中的悖论问题,在态势评估效率和准确性等方面优于Dempster、Yager和Leung等典型方法。Evidence theory is one of the main approaches to implement situation assessment based on rules. But evidence theory can result in paradox problem in conflicting evidence combination. Concerning this problem, by dissimilarity calculation, the importance of evidence was measured and original evidence was modified. A new approach based on the improved evidence theory was proposed. The new approach contained four steps including rules measurement, evidence modification, rules fusion and situation decision. The experiments show that the new approach can avoid paradox problem in the process of fusion based on evidence theory, and it is superior to typical approaches, such as Dempster approach, Yager approach and Leung approach, etc, in efficiency and accuracy of situation assesment.
分 类 号:TP393.08[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28