检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌波[1]
机构地区:[1]都江堰市医疗中心康复医学科,四川都江堰611830
出 处:《四川中医》2013年第12期132-134,共3页Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察、比较神经松动手法与传统推拿手法对神经根型颈椎病的疗效。方法:随机分为两组,神经松动手法组和推拿手法组,统计分析比较两组治疗后疗效。结果:两组治疗疗效经统计分析差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),VAS评分差值比较,治疗组较对照组降低更明显(P<0.01)。结论:神经根型颈椎病神经松动手法治疗组和推拿手法对照组比较有明显疗效优势。Objective: Observing and comparing the neural mobilization and the curative effect of massage on cervical spon- dylosis of nerve root type. Methods: 30 cases were randomly divided into two groups, neural mobilization group and massage group, statistical analysis to compare the efficacy of two groups after treatment. Results : The curative effects of the two groupshave statistical significance (P 〈 O. 05). The Tuina combined Traditional Chinese Medicine therapy had u more obvious vari- ances in VAS grade (P 〈 O. 01 ). Conclusion: The treatment group has better effect th^n the massage group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28