检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向逢春[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学博士后科研流动站
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第1期57-61,共5页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基 金:重庆市博士后科研项目特别资助项目(XM20120022)
摘 要:对让与担保的规制,首先要明确让与担保的地位和作用,这就需要将让与担保与现行法中有相似或相近功能的制度进行比较,从中发掘出让与担保的独特个性与特殊作用,以明确我国让与担保制度发展之价值。通过对德日两个主要大陆法国家中让与担保与买回制度的比较,并进而对我国大陆地区让与担保与相关制度进行实务区分,以体现出让与担保的独特优势、功能,突显其存在之必要性。For the regulation on security transfer, we must first know the status and role of security transfer, which needs to have comparison between security transfer and current laws of similar functions and similar systems, discovering the uniqueness and special role of transferring and security, to make clear our country the system of transferring guarantee development of value. Based on the two main Continental Law countries of Germany and Japan in the transferring guarantee and buying back, we further compare the real-life distinction of the transferring guarantee and buying back in the mainland of China, to reflect the unique advantages and features of transferring guarantee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222