巴塞尔Ⅲ性质之探  

The Exploration on the Nature of the Basel Ⅲ

作　　者：韩龙[1] 包承恩 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院 [2]江苏省常熟市人民法院

出　　处：《国际金融研究》2014年第2期53-59,共7页Studies of International Finance

基　　金：韩龙教授主持的2013年国家社会科学基金重大项目:"人民币国际化的法律问题研究"的阶段性成果(批准号:08AJY013)

摘　　要：巴塞尔Ⅲ的性质问题,由于事关巴塞尔委员会成员方是否有法律义务实施之,因而显得异常重要。巴塞尔委员会以及GHOS、G20峰会的性质及职权表明,巴塞尔Ⅲ不构成国际条约或协定。但随着巴塞尔Ⅲ出台后巴塞尔委员会各成员方基于履行国际承诺而纷纷将其转化为国内法,巴塞尔Ⅲ作为国际习惯法的国家实践和法律确信两要件基本具备,故巴塞尔Ⅲ构成巴塞尔委员会成员方之间的国际习惯。巴塞尔Ⅲ出台不久就获得国际习惯的性质,与现代国际习惯法的形成从传统的归纳推理方法向演绎推理方法的转变具有密切关系。The nature of Basel Ⅲ, which is the most prominent achievement in the post-crisis financial supervisory reform in the international community, is related to the issue whether the members of Basel Committee have the legal obligations to implement it, thus becoming very important. The nature and mandates of the Basel Committee, CHOS and G20 indicate that Basel Ⅲ does not constitute international treaty or agreement. But as the members of the Basel committee transform Basel Ⅲ into domestic legislation based on the performance of international promises and obligations after Basel Ⅲ came into effect, the elements of state practica and opiniojuris for Basel Ⅲ to constitute an international custom get ready, so Basel Ⅲ constitute the international custom among the members of the Basel Committee. The nature of international custom that Basel Ⅲ has achieved shortly after its emergence is closely related with the transformation from traditional inductive approach to deductive approach in the formation of modern international customs.

关 键 词：巴塞尔Ⅲ 国际惯例 国际条约 国家实践法律确信 

分 类 号：F831[经济管理—金融学]