犯罪客体:曲解、质疑与理性解读——兼论正当事由的体系性定位  

Criminal Object: Its Distortion,Question and Rational Interpretation: Also Concerning the System Location of Legitimate Reason

作　　者：彭文华[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2014年第1期89-97,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJC820091)"罪量视野下的犯罪论体系诸问题之困境与出路"

摘　　要：通说将犯罪客体与民事、经济、行政等法律所保护的社会关系严格区分,并将之限定为刑法分则规定的社会关系的整体,是不可取的。否定犯罪客体在犯罪认定中的作用,缺乏说服力。以法益等替代犯罪客体中的社会关系,并不可取。犯罪客体具有事实判断与价值评价双重功能。法律关系是犯罪客体的重要内容。正当事由符合特定法律关系,没有侵犯犯罪客体,不能认定为犯罪。It is not desirable for general theory to distinguish strictly criminal object from social relations that protected by civil law, economic law, administrative law and so on. At the same time, criminal object is defined as the whole social relations in the specific provisions of criminal law that does not conform to the provisions of the criminal law. It is not rea- sonable to negate criminal object＇s role in criminal cognizance and to replace social relations in criminal object with legal in- terest. Criminal object has dual functions of fact judgment and value evaluation. The legal relation is the important content of criminal object. Legitimate reason does not constitute a crime meet specific because it conforms to legal relation and can- not be determined in a crime.

关 键 词：犯罪客体 事实判断 价值评价 法律关系 正当事由 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]