检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓国防[1] 雷建平[2] 邓群[2] 吴于青[2]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属深圳市第三人民医院肺二科,518112 [2]江西省胸科医院内一科
出 处:《中国防痨杂志》2014年第1期21-24,共4页Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
摘 要:目的 探讨抗结核药物引起药物超敏反应的临床特点和处理策略.方法 回顾性分析2006年1月至2012年12月江西省胸科医院收治的32例抗结核药物引起超敏反应患者(简称“超敏组”)的临床表现、实验室检查和预后,并与同期发生过敏反应但非超敏反应(简称“非超敏组”)的32例患者进行比较.使用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计学处理;以t检验对计量资料进行统计分析,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果 超敏组患者主要表现为发热、全身皮疹、肝肾功能损害,血小板减少等(简称“临床症状”).超敏组临床症状出现[(18.36±7.54)d]早于非超敏组[(25.73±5.68)d],差异有统计学意义(t=4.41,P<0.01).住院时间[(34.23±9.37)d]长于非超敏组[(16.71±5.25)d],差异有统计学意义(t=9.23,P<0.01).超敏组患者肝肾功能[总胆红素(TBIL)(122.36±75.74)μmol/L,直接胆红素(DBIL)(57.43±11.29)μmol/L,丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)(389.55±68.46)U/L,天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)(294.81±53.72)U/L,血肌酐(Scr)(155.27±86.43) μmol/L,血尿素氮(BUN)(9.39±6.72)mmol/L)]损害严重于非超敏组[TBIL(18.35±7.16) μmol/L,DBIL (8.78±3.42)μmol/L,ALT (40.21±22.57)U/L,AST(38.77±14.86)U/L,Scr (89.12±29.37) μmol/L,BUN (5.28±1.75) mmol/L],差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为:7.73、23.40、27.39、25.99、4.09、3.34,P值均<0.01).超敏组血小板(PLT)[(31.35±12.82)×109/L]低于非超敏组[(153.48±64.11)×109/L],差异有统计学意义(t=10.56,P<0.01).结论 超敏反应患者起病急,过敏反应严重,多表现为多脏器功能损伤,有一定的死亡率,应引起从事结核病医务人员的高度重视.Objective To explore the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of anti-tuberculosis drug induced hypersensitivity. Methods Thirty-two cases with anti-tuberculosis drug induced hypersensitivity admitted to Jiangxi chest hospital from Jun. 2006 to Dec. 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, according to the clinical manifes- tation, laboratory test and prognosis (hypersensitivity group), and compared with those other 32 patients with allergic reaction but not hypersensitivity at the same period (non-hypersensitivity group). The categorical data were analyzed using t test by the SPSS 13.0 software. P value 〈 0.05 was considered statistically signi{icant. Results The symptoms of hypersensitivity group were fever, skin rash,abnormal liver and kidney function, throm- bocytopeni(clinic manifestation), which were present earlier than in the comparison group ((18.36 ±7.54) d vs (25.73±5.68) d), and significant differences were found between the two groups (t=4. 41, P%0.01). Hospitali- zation time of hypersensitivity group was longer than the non-hypersensitive group ((34.23± 9.37) d vs (16.71±5.25) d), the difference was statistically significant (t=9.23, P〈0. O1).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.49.72