检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄颖[1] 陆建常[2] 周立新[2] 李高忠[2] 吴芳[2]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区民族医院心血管内科二病区,南宁530001 [2]广西壮族自治区民族医院放射科,南宁530001
出 处:《中国医师进修杂志》2014年第1期30-33,共4页Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
摘 要:目的观察替米沙坦对代谢综合征(MS)合并原发性高血压(EH)患者内脏脂肪沉积的影响。方法选择合并MS的EH患者60例,按随机数字表法分为两组,每组30例,试验组给予替米沙坦40mg,1次/d治疗;对照组给予缬沙坦80mg,1次/d治疗,直至24周动态血压监测平均血压〈140/90mmHg(1mmHg:0.133kPa),采用多层螺旋CT影像学检查受试者皮下脂肪面积(SFA)和内脏脂肪面积(VFA),同时检测体质量指数(BMI)、血压、血糖、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA—IR)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。结果两组治疗前血压、BMI、血糖、HbA1c、血脂等一般临床资料比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);试验组治疗后VFA较治疗前显著降低[(127.8±16.6)cm2比(150.5±15.4)cm2],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),对照组治疗前后VFA比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);试验组和对照组治疗前后SFA均无明显改变,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);试验组治疗后HOMA—IR较治疗前显著降低(1.9±0.3比4.2±0.9),血清脂联素水平较治疗前显著增加[(5.77±0.71)mg/L比(3.16±0.72)mg/L],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论与缬沙坦比较,替米沙坦可显著减少MS合并EH患者内脏脂肪沉积,改善胰岛素抵抗。Objective To observe the effects of telmisartan treatment on the abdominal fat deposit in metabolic syndrome (MS) combined with essential hypertension (EH). Methods Sixty patients of MS combined with EH were divided into two groups according to random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The patients in experimental group were given telmisartan orally 40 mg once a day, and in control group were given valsartan 80 mg once a day,until average ambulatory blood pressure monitoring blood pressure was 〈 140/90 mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa) in 24 weeks. The visceral fat area (VFA) and subdermal fat area (SFA) was measured by multislice CT, at the same time the body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, blood glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and glyeosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) of the subjects was measured. Results The blood pressure, BMI, blood glucose, HbAic, and blood lipids between two groups before treatment had no statistical significance (P 〉 0.05 ). VFA in experimental group after treatment was lower than that before treatment [ ( 127.8 ±16.6) cm: vs. (150.5 ± 15.4) cm2] (P 〈 0.05 ). But there was no statistical significance of VAF in control group before and after treatment (P 〉0.05). The SFA in experimental group and control group had no statistical significance before and after the treatment (P 〉 0.05). The HOMA-IR in experimental group after treatmentwas reduced compared with that before treatment (1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9 ),and adiponectin was increased [(5.77 ±0.71) mg/L vs. (3.16 ±0.72) mg/L ] (P 〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with valsartan, telmisartan can significantly reduce the visceral fat deposition in MS combined with EH patients and improve insulin resistance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.245.163