检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱媛[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,南京210093 [2]扬州大学法学院,扬州225009
出 处:《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期140-147,共8页Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:转型期的中国,有必要对弱势群体进行法律界定。但弱势群体所具有的相对性,却与其法律概念所要求的确定性、规范性相冲突。从法律本身所具有的相对确定性、法律逻辑性出发,将人本主义法律观作为界定弱势群体原则性标准的法理基础,将实现人的生存权视为设置弱势群体法定标准的逻辑起点,将全面的一般条款加具体的列举作为弱势群体法律界定的立法技术选择,可以调和此冲突,并对弱势群体作出明确的法律界定。In the transitional period of the society, it is necessary to have a legal definition of the term 'vulnerable group'. However, the relativity stands in conflict with the definiteness and standardization of the legal concept. The author here starts from the relative definiteness and the logic of law, and takes humanistic view of law as the basis of juridical logic for the delimitation, which treats the survival right of the vulnerable group as the legitimate criterion. As a logical point of departure, the author then put together the comprehensive, general terms and practical listing as the legitimate technology choice for the definition, which is hence able to reconcile the conflict and make clear designation of the vulnerable group in society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14