防御方式问卷信效度再验证  

Reliability and validity of the version by retranslating of the defense style questionnaire

作　　者：李宁宁[1,2] 王旭梅[1] 姜潮[3] 徐庆怡 苏荣坤[4] 郑超 姜楠 隋雨彤 姜华 张琳[6] 

机构地区：[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院心理门诊,沈阳110817 [2]本溪市康宁医院 [3]大连医科大学 [4]沈阳市精神卫生中心 [5]本溪市卫生监督所 [6]朝阳市卫生学校

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2014年第1期80-82,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

摘　　要：目的重新翻译防御方式问卷（TheDefenseStyleQuestionnaire，DSQ），并分析其信效度。方法采用方便取样的原则选取社区居民437人，门诊患者166人进行DSQ和艾森克人格问卷的测量。初测3个月后，从社区居民中随机选取128人重测。结果（1）项目CR值为8．27～51．81（P〈0．01）。（2）DSQ四个因子的Cronbach＇sα系数为0．609～0．875，重测信度为0．72-0．81。（3）验证性因素，修正模型x2／df=3．05，GFI=0．90，AGFI=0．87，CFI=0．86，RMSEA=0．06。结论该中文版本DSQ具有较好的信效度，与理论模型有一定的拟合程度。Objective To retranslate and examine the reliability and validity of the defense style ques- tionnaire（DSQ）. Methods By convenience sampling 437community residents and 166 outpatients were assessed by the DSQ and Eysenck personality questionnaire（EPQ）. 128 among the community residents were retested with the DSQ after 3 months. Results （ 1 ） Each items of the CR values were 8.27-51.81 （P〈0.01）. （2） Cronbaeh＇ α of DSQ＇s four factors were 0.609-0.875, and test-retest reliability was 0.72-0.81. （3）Confirmatory factor analysis showed χ2/df = 3.05, GFI = 0.90, AGFI = 0.87, CFI = 0.86, RMSEA = 0.06. Conclusion DSQ by restranslating shows good reliability and validity, and the construction of the scale fit the original construction.

关 键 词：防御方式问卷 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]