检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学法学院,上海200092
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期110-116,共7页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:2010年10月颁布的《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》的第十五条和第四十六条的规定第一次在我国为人格权创设了冲突法保护规则,这有益于完善我国人格权法律制度。但是我国人格权内容的实体法规定不完善可致依人格权冲突规则无法找到准据法;规定的适用还可能导致对我国义务人的不公,甚至使我国义务人承担起发达国家法律上的高额损害赔偿责任的风险。文章尝试解析这些问题并提出解决方案,以期为未来司法解释的制定提供参考。Articles 15 and 46 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Application of Laws in Foreign-related Civil Relations promulgated in October, 2010 have for the first time established rules of application of laws in respect of personality right. On one hand, they are of great importance to perfect the legal system related to personality right in China. On the other hand, however, the imperfection of rules of substantive laws with respect to the content of personality right could lead to the absence of applicable laws according to the rules of relevant application of laws. In addition, it is very likely that the applications of the aforementioned Articles 15 and 46 will cause unfairness to an obligor of personality right. What is worse, obligors in our country may thus take huge risks to pay a great deal of compensation for damages as stipulated in the laws enacted in developed countries. And this thesis is making an effort to analyze and solve the problems above in order to provide reference for legal interpretations in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3