明代七子派“复古而陷伪”说脞谈  

A Discussion on “Retro but Falling into the Fakery” of Qizi School in Ming Dynasty

作　　者：魏宏远[1] 唐温秀 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学文学院

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期108-113,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目"<王世贞全集>整理与研究"(12&ZD159);国家社科基金项目"王世贞晚年文献与文学思想研究"(10CZW030);兰州大学2012年中央高校基本科研业务项目(人文社科类;12LZUJBWYB006)的研究成果

摘　　要：明代七子派"复古而陷伪"是一个历史命题,这一命题经过历时性的层层累加,达到了对七子派复古的丑化和妖魔化效果。这一命题有很大局限性,其弊端主要有三:其一、失之于对七子派复古的全面理解,侧重于从文学层面进行过度化概括;其二、失之于对七子派复古的多层面阐发,将七子派视为一个整体,无视主流与末流之別;其三、失之于对七子派复古的动态考察,未从变化的角度把握七子派成员不同时期的文学思想,刻意制造七子派与其他文派之争,无视各文学流派之间的交融与传承。王世贞晚年提出"有真我然后有真诗",有矫正七子派末流之弊的用意。＂Retro but falling into the fakery＂ of Qizi School in Ming Dynasty is a historical proposition. It triggers the uglification and demonization upon the retro movement of Qizi School with its diachronic development. However, the proposition has great limitations with three major disadvantages as follows; first, it does not give a comprehensive understanding on the retro movement of Qizi School, focusing on the overgeneralization from the point of view of literature; second, it fails to study the retro movement of Qizi School from different perspectives, treating Qizi School as a whole and ignoring the difference between the mainstream and branches; third, the dynamic investigation on the retro movement of Qizi School seems to get lost, failing to analyze their literary thoughts in different periods. Moreover, the proposition deliberately provokes the strife between Qizi School and other literary schools and ignores their integration and inheritance. ＂True poetry is born from true self＂ , proposed by Wang Shizhe in his late years, seems to arrive at certain rectification.

关 键 词：七子派 王世贞 袁宏道 真诗说 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]