浅析扒窃型盗窃罪着手之认定  

The Identification of Starting to Commit Crime of the Pick-pocketing Theft

作　　者：张宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国青年政治学院法学院,北京100089

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2014年第1期44-48,共5页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(八)》将扒窃规定为独立的定罪行为,因此使得扒窃犯罪成为盗窃罪的特殊行为类型。扒窃型盗窃罪着手的认定需要在坚持实质客观说的基础上通过时间和空间要素进行综合判断。只有当行为的实施对被害人财产法益具有现实而紧迫的危险时,才是扒窃犯罪的实行行为。具体而言,行为人为实施扒窃所进行的"试探行为",已经使得被害人的财物处于随时脱离占有的状态,对被害人的财产法益产生了紧迫的危险。但"试探行为"不能作广义的理解,只能是具有侵害财产法益紧迫危险的行为。The relevant provisions to the Eighth Criminal Law Amendment regulate the pick-pocketing thefts, which makes it a special type of larceny. Determination of pick-pocketing theft needs a comprehensive judgment through time and space elements on the basis of the substantive objectivism. Only when the act of the property law is a realistic and urgent danger, it can be seen as the crime. Specifically, the implementation of human behavior of pick-pocketing ＂exploratory behavior＂, has made the victim＇s property out of possession at any time, and brought imminent danger to the legal interest of the victim＇s property. But ＂exploratory behavior＂ can not be understood in a broad sense, and it belongs to an urgent dangerous behavior which only has violated the legal interest of property.

关 键 词：扒窃 实质客观说 试探行为 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]