检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学税务学院,100081 [2]中央财经大学税务学院税收计量研究中心,100081
出 处:《财贸经济》2014年第2期44-55,共12页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:中国博士后科学基金第54批面上项目(编号:2013M540075);北京市自然科学基金项目(11IA4709);中央财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(201305)的资助
摘 要:本文采用2002—2011年中国上市公司的样本数据,实证研究市场化进程对样本企业债务税盾的跨期效应及特征。研究发现:第一,在不考虑市场化因素影响的情况下,中国上市公司的债务税盾效应显著存在;第二,企业所在地市场化程度越高,债务税盾效果越显著;第三,市场化进程有助于抑制由于"预算软约束"带来的企业债务风险;第四,中国上市公司债务税盾存在行业效应,表现为除房地产、原材料等行业外,对绝大多数行业效果明显。由此本文建议:政府应进一步推进市场化改革,以有利于企业降低财务风险,发挥债务税盾效用;运用行业优惠为主的企业所得税优惠政策,促进特定行业发展。Using the data sample of listed companies of China from 2002 to 2011, this paper analyzes the inter-temporal effects of market-orient process on tax shield of enterprise debt with multi-regression approach. The research shows that: first, without considering the effects of marketization, there is a significant effect of debt tax shield on listing companies of China; second, the higher the marketization level of the enterprise location is, the more significant the effect of debt tax shield is; third, the market orient process helps to reduce the enterprise financial risk from soft budget constraint; fourth, the effects of debt tax shield on listing companies of China are different for industries, with insignificant effects for real estate industries and significant effects for the remaining industries. Therefore, this paper suggests that the government should further promote the reformation of marketization and carry out preferential tax policy with industry differences, in order to advance the debt tax shield effects, reduce the financial risk and develop the specific industries for enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15