检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪圣毅[1] 郭爱军[1] 韩涵[1] 王宁[1] 郑立平[1] 宋景戈[1] 刘弋[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院普通外科,合肥230022
出 处:《安徽医科大学学报》2014年第2期271-273,共3页Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基 金:安徽高校省级自然科学研究项目(编号:KJ2012Z180);安徽省博士后研究人员科研经费资助项目(2011年)
摘 要:采用1∶4配对的病例对照方法,选择行巨脾切除的患者60例,脾静脉最后分级离断原位巨脾切除术12例为改良组,常规原位巨脾切除术48例为对照组。改良组手术前后脾脏的长径(cm)分别为19.28±3.90、18.29±2.96,脾脏厚度(cm)分别为7.21±2.54、6.41±1.11,差异无统计学意义;输血量与出血量呈正相关(r=0.717,P<0.01)。与对照组比较,改良组出血量、输血量少,不良事件发生率低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),改良方法安全有效。With a 1 : 4 matched case-control study design, 60 cases underwent orthotopic megasplenectomy were selected,among them,12 cases with splenic vein&#39;s secondary branch cutting in the last step were grouped to modi-fied group, and the other 48 cases underwent routine orthotopic megasplenectomy were grouped to control group. In modified group, before and after operation, there were no significant differences in the spleen length( cm) (19.28&#177;3.90 vs 18.29&#177;2.96, P&gt;0.05) and thickness(cm)(7.21&#177;2.54 vs 6.41&#177;1.11,P&gt;0.05),blood transfu-sion was positively correlated with bleeding(r=0.717, P&lt;0.01). Compared with control group,the bleeding and transfusion volume and adverse event rate were significantly reduced in the modified group, suggesting that modified orthotopic megasplenectomy was safe and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.219.214