检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市福田区第二人民医院急诊科,广东深圳518049
出 处:《临床医学工程》2014年第1期104-105,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的探讨严重多发伤患者的急救经验和护理效果。方法入选我院2011年3月至2013年6月收治的严重多发伤患者110例,设为观察组,选择同期收治的106例严重多发伤患者作为对照,设为对照组,对照组采用常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上采用循证护理。比较两组患者的抢救成功率和护理满意率等。结果观察组抢救成功率为91.8%(101/110),显著高于对照组的82.1%(87/106),观察组护理满意率90.9%(100/110),明显高于对照组的75.5%(80/110),差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论循证护理干预有助于提高严重多发伤患者的抢救成功率和护理满意度。Objective To investigate the experience of emergency treatment and nursing effect for severe multiple trauma patients. Methods 110 patients with severe multiple trauma in our hospital from March 2011 to June 2013 were set as observation group, and 106 patients with severe multiple trauma at the same time were chosen as control group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while patients in the observation group received the evidence-based nursing on the basis of routine nursing care. The success rate of rescue and satisfactory rate of nursing were compared between two groups. Results The success rate of rescue was 91.7% (101/110) in the observation group, significantly higher than 82.1% (87/106) in the control group (P 〈0.05). The satisfactory rate of nursing was 90.9% (100/110) in the observation group, significantly higher than 75.5% (80/110) in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusions Evidence-based nursing intervention is helpful to improve the success rate of rescue and satisfactory rate of nursing in patients with severe multiple trauma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148