水污染共同侵权司法救济的特殊规则探讨  

Special rules of judicial remedy to joint infringement of water pollution

作　　者：唐忠辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]水利部发展研究中心,北京100038

出　　处：《水利经济》2014年第1期1-6,16,共7页Journal of Economics of Water Resources

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(09CFX039)

摘　　要：针对水污染共同侵权案件的特殊性,必须设计不同于一般侵权的司法规则。结合救济受害人、方便法院裁判、防范自由裁量权滥用等因素的考虑,运用法律解释、价值分析等方法,分析认为,水污染共同侵权诉讼应当在被告选择、法院管辖、诉讼模式等方面实行特殊规则。研究结论表明,在选择管辖时,受害人选择损害结果所在地法院诉讼最为有利,在级别管辖上也可依法争取更高一级法院管辖;在诉讼模式上,侵权责任之诉和责任分担之诉理应在同一个诉讼程序中一次性解决;受害人对加害人和赔偿权利应当享有最终选择权和自由处分权;受害人人数众多的,原则上应当合并立案审理;应建立健全专家证人制度,为审判提供专业技术支撑。For the specialty of the cases about joint infringement of water pollution,special judicial rules which are different from those for general torts should be designed. In consideration of the factors of relieving victims, facilitating courts make judgments and preventing misuse of discretion,the special judicial rules should be applied to the aspects of defendant selection,court jurisdiction,litigation mode and so on in the joint infringement cases of water pollution. The research findings indicate that for the selection of the court jurisdiction,bringing lawsuits to the court of the place where damages occur is the best for victims,and the court jurisdiction should be the higher one. For the litigation mode,the lawsuits of liability affirmation and liability apportionment should be resolved in one legal process. The victims should have the final choice right to infringer and free disposition right to compensation. The courts should combine and hear the lawsuits in principle when there are many victims. A sound system of expert witness should be established to provide technical support for the trials.

关 键 词：水污染 共同侵权 司法救济 特殊规则 

分 类 号：D922.66[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]