两种不同静脉输液拔针按压方法的临床对比研究  

Study on two methodes of Intravenousinfusion;Removal of infusion needle;Compreffi-sionmethod

作　　者：连立弢 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古第四医院门诊,内蒙古呼和浩特010080

出　　处：《疾病监测与控制》2014年第2期123-124,共2页Journal of Diseases Monitor and Control

摘　　要：目的探讨两种不同静脉输液拔针按压方法的临床效果。方法对300例输液患者采取随机分组,比较两种不同拔针方法病人疼痛、皮肤出血、皮下淤血发生率的差异。结果观察组所采用的拔针按压方法在减少患者疼痛、皮肤出血和皮下淤血发生率方面,明显优于传统的拔针方法。结论本研究新式拔针法省时节力,可以减轻疼痛减少皮下淤血的发生率。Obiectlve Mlhetwo diffen-ntmethods ofintravenousinfusion Needle pushthe clinical n-ults. Methods 300ofbansfilsion patients random izedtotake Comparison 0RwodifferentmethodsNeedle pain patients andHemorrhage and Subcutaneous hematoma oflhe differencesintheincidence. Results Observer Group Ne-qh used compressi＇on method in mlucirtg pain; patients with skin and subcutaneous bleeding occm＇red congtion rate, obviously supen＇or 10 traditional n-, cthodofNeedle. Conclusions Inthispaperthe new]awProvinceNeedle season, and can relieve pain reducetheincidence of subcutaneous hemam.

关 键 词：静脉输液 拔针 按压方法 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]