检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1] 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心 武汉 430071 [2] 武汉东湖新技术开发区管委会 武汉 430079
出 处:《情报杂志》2014年第1期27-31,共5页Journal of Intelligence
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“我国区域基础研究特点与竞争力对比分析研究”(编号:13CTQ025)
摘 要:创造性破坏视角下,施引专利对被引专利相对竞争优势的盗窃是各种专利引文关系的共性。由于观察对象的不同,这一效应在耦合专利、共引专利、直接引用专利中的影响程度有所不同。面向技术竞争情报研究的不同主题,指出三类专利引文分析方法的适用范围:基于专利耦合的技术竞争现状识别、基于专利共引的技术竞争历史关系总结、基于专利直接引用的企业技术竞争态势识别;并从多个方面对这三类研究方法进行了对比。Under the perspective of creative destruction, the market stealing on cited patents by citing patents is universal among various citations between patents. However, the effect of creative destruction varies in co-coupling patents, co-cited patents, and patents of direct citation. A methodological framework of technical competitive intelligence researches based on patents citations was established and classi-fied into three categories. Applicable fields of patent citation analysis methods were suggested in response to different topics in competitive technical intelligence studies: analysis of current competitive relations based on patent coupling, analysis of historical competitive relations based on patent co-citation, and analysis of competition dynamics based on direct patent citations. Finally, a multi-dimensional compara-tive study was conducted on the suggested three methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15