检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学护理学院
出 处:《护理研究(上旬版)》2014年第2期423-425,共3页Chinese Nursing Researsh
摘 要:[目的]构建一套科学、合理、实用的护理学综合性实验评价指标体系。[方法]采用文献分析法、理论分析法和头脑风暴法初步构建护理学综合性实验评价指标体系,运用德尔菲法通过3轮专家咨询和论证确定评价指标及各指标权重。[结果]确立一级指标4项、二级指标21项及其权重;4项一级指标及21项二级指标的协调系数分别是0.945,0.851。[结论]专家对评价指标权重赋值意见协调程度好、可信度高,可用于对护理学综合性实验的评价。Objective: To build a set of scientific, reasonable and practical assessment indicator system of nursing comprehensive experiment. Meth- ods :Preliminary building assessment indicator systems of nursing compre- hensive experiment with document analysis method,theory analysis meth- od and brainstorming method, to confirm evaluation index and various in- dexs weight applying Delphi Method by 3 rounds expert consultation and argument. Results: Foru first indicators and 21 secondary indicators and their weights were established. The coordination coefficient of 4 the first indicators and 21 secondary indicators were respectively 0. 945 and 0. 851. Conclusion. The coordination degree of experts ' assignment is better for e- valuation index weight. Its reliability is higher. It can be used to evaluate nursing comprehensive experiments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179