检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈梦丽
机构地区:[1]广东省广州市越秀区妇幼保健院,广州510055
出 处:《当代护士(中旬刊)》2014年第3期172-173,共2页Modern Nurse
摘 要:目的为寻求有效的查对方法,减少患者身份识别错误。方法对100例静脉输液患者进行自身对照法比较。采取对照法,即护士给患者进行静脉输液前,叫床号姓名,并有意将患者的姓或名用普通话或方言以谐音或近音的方法叫错,判断患者是否有纠错能力;后采取观察法,即对患者进行对照法以后再反问患者的姓名,由患者回答。记录两种查对方法识别患者身份的正确性。结果对照法正确率为56%,观察法正确率为100%,经统计学分析,P<0.01,差异有显著性。结论护士进行护理技术操作前呼叫床号后再反问患者姓名的查对方法能正确认别其身份。Objective To explore effective checking measures of patient identification, and reduce errors. Methods Compared 100 patients in intravenous transfusion of two groups. Firstly, in control way, nurses called patients wrong on purpose in Mandarin or Dialect to check patients whether can aware the errors. Secondly, in experimental way, nurses did in the control way first, and then asked their names; let patients named themselves. Results The accurate rate in first way is 50%, the second is 100%. There were statistical significant different between two checking measure. Conclusion It is an effective measure which can guarantee the accurate of patients' identification that nurses call patients' number and then ask their names before intravenous transfusion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249