检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海申通轨道交通研究咨询有限公司,上海201103 [2]同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海200092
出 处:《核动力工程》2014年第1期71-77,共7页Nuclear Power Engineering
基 金:科技部国家重点实验室基金项目(SLDRCE09-B-13)
摘 要:针对核能设施地震动模拟中合成人工地震动功率谱包络的要求,比较由反应谱计算功率谱的几种常用方法,并分析各方法中相关参数对结果的影响。此外,采用拟合小阻尼反应谱生成人工时程并取各时程功率谱平均值的方法,可得到与反应谱相对应的功率谱。以AP1000和RG1.60的反应谱及其对应的目标功率谱为分析对象,考察由反应谱计算功率谱各种方法的计算精度,并着重对Kaul方法的适用性进行分析。最后给出核能设施地震动模拟时,获得足够精度功率谱的相关建议。Abstract. The requirements to envelope a target power spectral density (PSD) function compatible with the design response spectra are usually prescribed by seismic codes for generating artificial time series as seismic input. This paper contrasts several methodologies which are most widely used in engineering seismology for defining spectrum compatible PSD. Parameters of these methodologies were analyzed using the RG1.60 and AP1000 design response spectra of safe shutdown earthquake. The emphasis was then placed on the method proposed by Kaul and its applicability was illustrated. Artificial time histories, whose response spectra were in agreement with 2%-damped design response spectrum, were generated and their average PSD would be the minimum PSD requirements compatible with the spectrum. Numerical examples show the accuracy and applicability of those approaches.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56