住房权救济的潜力和程度:以实例分析进行  

The Potential and Extent of Housing Right Remedy-A Case Study

作　　者：韩敬[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南长沙学院,湖南长沙410003

出　　处：《政法学刊》2013年第2期56-64,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"住房权保障的国家义务研究"(12YJC820032);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"法治湖南下住房保障地方立法研究"(12C0469);长沙学院人才引进科研基金项目(XF1107)

摘　　要：作为社会权的住房权,虽在世界范围内已得到确认,然而其救济情况却不容乐观。在国际层面,对住房权的救济以间接救济为主;在区际层面,对住房权的救济各区域之间差距甚大,以欧洲较为完善;在国家层面,对住房权的救济呈现多样化发展,或通过宪法规定住房权予以直接救济,或通过普通法律规定住房权予以直接救济,或由州法院根据州宪法对住房权进行直接救济,或通过适用或解释生命权对住房权进行间接救济。Housing right as a kind of social right has been recognized in the world. However, the situation of its remedy is not optimistic. At the international level, the remedy of housing right is mainly indirect remedy. At the regional level, there exist great differences among different regions and European countries tend to be more per- fect. At the national level, the remedy of housing right tend to be diversified with some countries prescribing in constitution direct remedy, some prescribing in common law direct remedy, some state courts prescribing in state constitution direct remedy and some prescribe indirect remedy by applying to life right.

关 键 词：住房权 直接救济 间接救济 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]