《文选》分文体为三十七类说辨正——《文选》分体三种说论衡之一  

On the Identifying the Opinion of 37 Categories of the Literary Style of Wenxuan

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第6期70-76,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)

摘　　要：《文选》分文体为三十七类说难以成立。就版本言,陈八郎本和朝鲜正德本与日本藏"九条本"等均有"移""难"二体;就《文选》序次作家之实际情况和《文选序》"各以时代相次"说等作综合的考察,《文选》原本必既有"移"、亦有"难"。即《文选》分体既不是三十七类,更非三十八类,而只能是三十九类。从研究方法的层面上说,当注意发掘《文选》本身内在的证据,而别将两回事当一码事看,并应密切关注当下的相关研究与"新发现"之文献。The argument that literary style of Wenxuan is divided into 37 categories is hard to be verified. As for the version, Chen Balang and Korean Zhengde as well as Japanese ＂Jiutiao version＂ share the literary styles of ＂yi＂ and ＂nan＂; as for the comprehensive research for the chronological order of authors and the signals in related versions, Wenxuan must have ＂yi＂ and ＂nan＂; in other words, the category of literary styles divided by Wenxuan is neither 37 nor 38, but 39. As for the research approach, we should find the internal proof from Wenxuan , instead of treating them as the same, and we need to pay close attention to the related research and the reference of ＂new discovery＂.

关 键 词：《文选》 分类 三十七类说 穆克宏 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]