论恺撒史学的政治实用特性  

On Political Expedient Characteristics of Caesar Historiography

作　　者：蔡丽娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学民族学与社会学学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《凯里学院学报》2014年第1期9-11,共3页Journal of Kaili University

基　　金：中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目"罗马共和国后期的史学与政治"项目编号:zsy10010~~

摘　　要：恺撒留给我们两部完整的战记,即《高卢战记》和《内战记》。《高卢战记》以第三人称写作,以看似客观公正的第三者的立场记载恺撒在高卢的军事行动,以掩盖反驳罗马国内质疑他发动高卢战争的目的在于建立个人功绩这一政治目的。《内战记》更是一部纯粹的政治辩护著作,把发动内战的责任推给庞培。这两部著作不仅记载恺撒政治军事生涯,而且也是他用来为自己政治行为辩护、建立政治威信和攻击政敌的政治舞台。Commentarii de Bello Gallico and Commentarii de Bello Civili are Julius Caesar＇ s firsthand account of Gallic Wars and wars against Gnaeus Pompeius and the Senate. These works are not only re- cords of Caesar＇ s political and military life, but also front line defending his political activities and fighting against his political enemies. In Commentarii de Bello Gallico, Caesar used third person narra- tive writing style to wrap up his political defending intension in objective and fair. With the same polit- ical motivation, Commentarii de Bello Civili is also made purely a political work to defend his political benefit. Caesar＇s historical work provides a political picture of the late republic from another perspec- tive.

关 键 词：恺撒 《高卢战记》 《内战记》 政治性 

分 类 号：K126[历史地理—历史学]