检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张艳春[1] 晁晓会 耿德军[2] 贺金龙[2] 彭燕[2] 吴永红[1] 李志慧[1] 高艳[1] 李雨[3] 张成岗[1]
机构地区:[1]军事医学科学院放射与辐射医学研究所,全军军事认知与心理卫生研究中心,蛋白质组学国家重点实验室 [2]中国人民解放军63880部队 [3]第二军医大学海医系放射医学教研室
出 处:《军事医学》2014年第1期57-61,共5页Military Medical Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(31101049;81170558);蛋白质组学国家重点实验室自主研究课题资助项目(SKLP-K201004)
摘 要:目的采用问卷调查方式了解复杂电磁环境部队作业人员对电磁辐射防护的认识,为研发相应的防护措施提供参考。方法随机选取某部98名复杂电磁环境作业人员为研究对象,采用调查问卷了解其对电磁辐射及其防护相关知识的认识情况。结果共收回有效问卷94份,结果分析显示,调查对象对电磁辐射与电离辐射的区别、危害和防护等都具有一定程度的了解,但还需进一步加强专业培训。同时,对电磁辐射的危害程度及防护方法的了解不足,而随着调查对象文化程度的增加,对于电磁辐射危害与防护的了解更为全面和正确。结论通过问卷调查发现电磁辐射防护知识在作业人员中相对比较匮乏,提示应进一步加强电磁辐射相关知识的宣传教育。Objective To provide reference for protection evaluation of soldiers working in a complex electromagnetic environment by investigating their knowledge on electromagnetic radiation (EMR) protection via means of a questionnaire. Methods Ninety-eight soldiers working in complex electromagnetic environments were selected by random sampling. Ques- tionnaires were designed, involving the hazard of and protection against EMR. Then the results of the survey were analyzed. Results Ninety-four questionnaires were collected. Results showed that the soldiers had some knowledge of the difference between EMR and ionizing radiation, and the hazard of and protection against EMR, but professional training was needed. In addition, their knowledge of the hazard of and protection against EMR could be improved through education. Conclusion The knowledge about EMR is insufficient among soldiers and needs to be improved.
分 类 号:R122.4[医药卫生—环境卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30