严格审查修改说明是保证论文学术质量的重要环节  

Carefully checking authors' response to reviewers' comments:a crucial measure to ensure the quality of sci-tech journals

作　　者：王蕾[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家气象中心<气象>编辑部,北京100081

出　　处：《编辑学报》2014年第1期37-39,共3页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：修改说明是稿件退修过程中作者对审稿意见的回复,是作者行使知情权、参与权、表达权(申诉权、话语权)和监督权的体现;因此是编辑质量控制流程中不可忽视的一个环节。本文针对科技论文中作者对修改说明重视不够,存在敷衍搪塞、避而不答或答非所问的一些现象,提出了改进措施并阐述了编辑在质量控制中的意义和作用。Authors＇ response to reviewers＇ comments is authors＇ answer to reviewer＇s suggestions, questions or criticisms, and is the reflection of authors＇ right to know, rights of participation, expression and supervision. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in the course of journal quality control. A lot of authors cannot attach enough importance to their response to reviewers＇ comments, often prevaricating, avoiding questions, or even giving irrelevant answers. In this paper, some measures are proposed targeting these phenomena, and editor＇s role in is also diseussesed controlling the oualitv of sei-teeh Journals.

关 键 词：科技期刊 稿件退改 修改说明 质量控制 严格审查 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]