生产性服务与装备制造业融合程度的国际比较——基于OECD投入产出表的分析  

International Comparison of Industrial Convergence between Producer Services and Machinery Industry: An Analysis Based on OECD Input-output Table

作　　者：楚明钦[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学经济学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2014年第2期52-63,共12页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：2011年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD790036)

摘　　要：文章基于OECD Input-output Database中G7国家和金砖五国中的印度、巴西和中国Mid-2000s投入产出数据,比较分析了这些国家生产性服务与装备制造业的融合程度。中国经济中物质投入比重高于发达国家,而生产性服务投入比重低于发达国家;由于物质投入比重比较高,中国国民经济增加值率远低于发达国家;中国装备制造业对生产性服务业各细分行业的需求高于发达国家,而中国装备制造业的生产性服务投入低于发达国家,说明中国生产性服务与装备制造业的融合程度比较低。中国装备制造业各细分行业影响力系数都高于发达国家;中国生产性服务业中研究与发展业和其他商务服务业的影响力系数远高于发达国家,而感应度系数远低于发达国家。Using the input-output data of mid-2000s from OECD Input-output Database concerning the G7 countries and BRICS countries such as India, Brazil and China, this paper comparatively analyzes the degree of convergence between the equipment manufacturing industry and the producer service industry in these countries. It finds that the proportion of input of the equipment manufacturing industry in China is higher than that of the developed countries, but that of the producer service industry is lower; the value-added rate of the national economy in China is far lower than that in the developed countries; for each subdivision of the producer services industry, the equipment manufacturing industry of China has a higher middle demand than that of the developed countries; the influence coefficient of the equipment manufacturing industry in China is higher than that in the developed countries; the influence coefficient of the R＆D industry as well as the business service industry in China is higher than that in the developed countries, however, the sensitivity coefficient is lower.

关 键 词：生产性服务 装备制造业 投入产出 国际比较 

分 类 号：F716[经济管理—产业经济]