间歇服药法治疗慢性盆腔炎(湿热瘀结型)多中心、平行、随机对照60例疗效评价  

Clinical Evaluation of Intermittent Medication Method in Treating 60 CPID Cases(Damp Heat and Blood Stasis Syndrome) by Multi-Center,Parallel,Randomized Control Trails

作　　者：谢萍[1] 郑静[2] 唐佳佳[2] 陈姚宇[2] 赵美珠[2] 徐哲[2] 

机构地区：[1]成都中医药大学附属医院,四川成都610075 [2]成都中医药大学,四川成都610072

出　　处：《辽宁中医杂志》2014年第2期261-263,共3页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家中医临床研究基地病种研究专项分项目(CSZYJ2011013);成都中医药大学附属医院院基金(2011-D-YY-07)

摘　　要：目的:探讨间歇服药法治疗慢性盆腔炎(湿热瘀结型)的临床疗效。方法:将60例慢性盆腔炎(湿热瘀结型)患者随机分为两组,其中治疗组30例,对照组30例,两组均服用清湿止痛汤,治疗组采用间歇服药法,对照组采用传统服药法,8周为1个疗程,并于第4、8周观察疗效。结果:治疗组临床愈显率96.66%;对照组临床愈显率93.33%;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:间歇服药法与传统服药法具有同等的治疗效果,且相比之下较传统服药法能减少患者的经济负担,节约药品资源,临床服用胃肠道副作用小,可尝试临床推广运用。Objective：To explore the clinical effect of intermittent medication method in treating CPID （damp heat and blood stasis syndrome）. Methods：60 cases （damp heat and blood stasis syndrome）were randomly divided into 2 groups,with the 30 ca- ses in each group. Both of the groups took Qingshi Zhitong Decoction. The treatment group took intermittent medication method, and the control group took traditional medication method. 8 weeks was one course of treatment. The clinical effect was observed at the 4th week and 8th week. Results ：The markedly effective rate of treatment group was 96.66% ,and of the control group was 93. 33%. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups （P 〉 O. 05 ）. Conclusion： Intermittent medication method and traditional medication method has the equal clinical effect. Compared with the traditional medication method, the inter- mittent medication method has the functions to reduce the economic burden of patients, save medicines resources and reduce the gastrointestinal side effects, and could be popularization in the clinical treatment of other chronic diseases.

关 键 词：慢性盆腔炎 间歇服药法 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R711.33[医药卫生—妇产科学]