检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:牛占忠[1] 张喜平[1] 杜杏坤[1] 陈宝财[1]
出 处:《辽宁中医杂志》2014年第2期281-283,共3页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:沧州市科学技术研究与发展指导计划项目(1123079ZD)
摘 要:目的:通过运用中药补肾疏肝汤加味和氯硝安定治疗失眠的疗效对比,以探讨中药补肾疏肝汤治疗失眠的效果。方法:将符合实验入组标准的96例失眠患者随机分成两组:治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组运用中药补肾疏肝汤治疗,对照组运用氯硝安定治疗,疗程为30天。疗程结束后对两组进行疗效观察。结果:两组患者治疗后的有效率分别为:治疗组91.7%,对照组83.4%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。治疗结束10天后回访有效率分别为:治疗组77.1%,对照组,39.6%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01)。两组患者治疗结束10天后回访匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分比较:治疗组为(6.64±1.58)分,对照组为(11.92±2.13)分,两组对比有显著性差异(P<0.01)。且对照组患者的药物副反应明显高于治疗组。结论:中药补肾疏肝汤加味对失眠患者有显著的治疗作用,且其疗效优于氯硝安定,尤其远期疗效更优于氯硝安定。Objective:To study the efficacy of Bushen Shugan Decoction in treatment of insomnia by comparing with Clonaze- pare. Methods :96 eases were divided into 2 groups randomly: treated group with Bushen Shugan Decoction and control group with Clonazepam. Both groups were observed after 30 days. Results :Treatment group's clinical total effectiveness was 91.7% ,and that of the control group was 83.4%. The comparison differences had statistics significance (P 〈 0.05 ). 10 days after the treatment finished, the treatment group's clinical total effectiveness was 77.1%, and that of the control group was 39.6%. The comparison differences had statistics significance(P 〈 0.01 ). The scores of PSQI of the treatment group was 6.64 ± 1.58, and the control group's was 11.92 ± 2.13. The comparison differences had statistics significance (P 〈 0.01 ). At the same time, the adverse reac- tions of control group were more serious than that of the treatment group. Conclusion:The efficacy of Bushen Shugan Decoction in treatment of insomnia is more remarkable than Clonazepam, especially the long - term efficacy.
分 类 号:R256.23[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120