检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙妮[1,2] 张钢[2] 郭洪波[1] 张冉[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学医学院,湖南长沙410013 [2]长沙血液中心
出 处:《实用预防医学》2014年第2期233-234,共2页Practical Preventive Medicine
基 金:湖南省卫生厅资助项目(2006-247);湖南省科技厅资助项目(2012FJ4283)
摘 要:目的 探讨互助献血与街头自愿无偿献血者的人员构成和血液安全性差异. 方法 统计2012年长沙地区互助献血群体和街头自愿无偿献血人群的年龄、性别、学历构成及血液检测不合格率,进行对比. 结果 互助献血人群年龄和学历构成比较均匀,而街头自愿无偿献血人群以18~35岁的年轻人为主,学历越高,献血意愿越强;互助献血血液检测不合格率高于街头自愿无偿献血人群. 结论 互助献血存在的血液安全隐患更大,应当适度控制.Objective To analyze the differences of personnel ratios and blcxxt safety between directed blood donors and volun- teer donors. Methods We analyzed and compared the differences of age, sex, educational background and the rates of infec- tious disease markers between directed blood donors and volunteer donors in Changsha region in 2012. Results Personnel ra- tios of directed blood donors would not be influenced by the age and education level, while most of volunteer donors were young people aged 18 to 35 years, and the higher education level led to stronger willingness of blood donation. Directed blood donation had higher viral marker rates than volunteer blood donation. Conclusions Directed blood donation has greater risk and should be properly controlled.
分 类 号:R193.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222