中美民族政策价值比较：马克思人类解放理论--从“第二代民族政策”谈起  

A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL POLICY BETWEEN CHINA AND THE US WITH THE FOCUS OF MARX'S THEORY ON HUMAN EMANCIPATION——From the second generation of national polic

作　　者：于春洋[1] 贺金瑞[2] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古工业大学马克思主义学院m呼和浩特010051 [2]中央民族大学哲学与宗教学学院,北京100081

出　　处：《广西民族研究》2014年第1期14-19,共6页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“百年共和的经验与启示:少数民族和民族宗教对现代中国建立、建设和治理的贡献和潜力研究”(12JJD850002)

摘　　要：无论是历史上的"大熔炉"政策,还是在当代获得很大成功的"马赛克"政策,美国的民族政策在本质上从未突破"政治解放"的范畴。实现政治解放而又止于政治解放,这既是认识美国民族政策的重要线索,也可用以衡量美国维护其资产阶级狭隘利益的价值取向。从马克思人类解放理论入手分析可以发现,中国的民族政策实践历经民族自决、联邦制到民族区域自治的艰辛探索,其价值目标是通过政治解放而最终实现人类解放。这不仅是把握中国的民族政策的关键,而且是实践马克思人类解放理论的重要成果和价值显现。当代中国的民族政策的内在价值定位,是各族人民当家做主、各族人民共同富裕和各族人民真实平等。Whether it is a ＇ melting pot＇ policy in American history, or the ＇ mosaic＇ policy with great success in contemporary, U.S. national policy has never made a breakthrough within the category of ＇political liberation＇ in essence. It is not only an important clue to understand the U.S. national policy, but also a measurement to weigh how the United States maintains its narrow interests of bourgeois values that ＇ political liberation＇ has been achieved but ends there. Starting from the analysis of Marxg theory on hu- man emancipation, we can find that the Chinese national policy has experienced a painstaking exploration from national self - determination, federalism to regional ethnic autonomy, and that the value target of Chi- na＇ s national policy is to achieve the final human emancipation through political liberation. This is not only the key to grasp the Chinese national policy, but the important achievements and value realization to prac-tice Marxist theory on human emancipation. The intrinsic value orientation of contemporary Chinese national policy is to make all people to be the masters of their affairs, to achieve the goal of rich and true equity for the people of all nationalities collectively.

关 键 词：人类解放理论 政治解放 民族政策 “第二代民族政策” 

分 类 号：D633.0[政治法律—政治学]