检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京市朝阳区疾病预防控制中心,北京100021
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2014年第2期157-159,共3页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
摘 要:目的了解北京某城区各级医疗机构的消毒效果现状,为加强消毒管理提供科学依据。方法采用现场抽样检测方法,对某城区各级医疗机构的消毒效果进行调查。结果连续5年共采集不同级别医疗机构各种消毒对象40 781件,消毒效果平均总合格率为95.8%。自2009以来,该区医疗机构消毒效果逐渐得到改善,只有医护人员手卫生质量、医疗污水处理和紫外线灯的合格率低于90%。该区医疗机构室内空气消毒效果以Ⅰ类环境最低,平均合格率仅78.1%,而Ⅱ类环境和Ⅲ类环境室内空气消毒效果合格率分别为92.9%和96.7%。结论该城区各级医疗机构消毒质量平均合格率较高,但医护人员手和室内空气等较关键项目消毒效果需要重点加强管理。Objective To know the disinfection efficacy of medical institutions of a district in Beijing, so as to provide the scientific basis for strengthening the management of disinfection. Methods On - the - spot sampling investigation was used to survey the disinfection efficacy of medical institutions of the district. Results 40 781 samples of various objects from different levels of medical institutions were collected for 5 successive years. The total pass rate of disinfection efficacy was 95.8%. Since year 2009, the overall disinfection efficacy of medical institutions had gradually improved. In all test i-tems, the pass rate of disinfection efficacy for medical personnel hand and hospital wastewater were lower than 90%. For indoor air, the disinfection efficacy of category I was the worst and the pass rate was only 78.1%. The pass rate of disinfec- tion efficacy of category II and category III was 92. 9% and 96. 7%, respectively. Conclusion The disinfection efficacy of all levels of medical institutions in the district is with better quality, but the management of important items, such as medi- cal personnel hand and indoor air need to be strengthened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40