检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙广才[1] 邵世鹏[2] 魏文礼[2] 郑艳[2]
机构地区:[1]渭南师范学院数学与信息科学学院,陕西渭南714099 [2]西安理工大学水利水电学院,西安710048
出 处:《渭南师范学院学报》2014年第3期5-9,共5页Journal of Weinan Normal University
基 金:陕西省教育厅科学研究计划项目:水动力数学模型的修正及应用(2010JK535)
摘 要:底流消能是借助于一定的工程措施控制水跃位置,通过水跃发生的表面旋滚和强烈紊动来消除余能.底流消能综合式消力池适当降低护坦的高程,同时又修建不太高的消能坎,是一种造价经济的消力池.文章应用不同计算方法计算了综合式消力池的挖深深度和消能坎高度.将结果对比分析发现:采用能量方程的计算方法得出的消力池深度比较合适,而采用由动量方程得出的计算方法所得结果偏小33.5%.最后从原理上分析了由动量方程得出的计算方法计算结果偏小的原因,建议消力池挖深深度的计算采用能量方程得出的方法.Under flow energy dissipation takes some engineering measures to control water jump position in, and to eliminate residual energy by the water jump surface roller and strong turbulence. Comprehensive energy dissipation pool is a cost-economy en- ergy dissipation pool due to lower apron elevation and building not too high energy dissipation obstacle. The previous studies on the conjugation water depth and the length of free hydraulic jump for a gradually expanding stilling basin were analyzed. The height of obstacle at the end of a gradually expanding flat-bottom stilling basin was calculated by different calculation methods. The compara- tive analysis of calculation results shows that the method using energy equation is more appropriate, and that the calculation result of the height of obstacle by the method using momentum equation is 33.5% smaller than that by the method using energy equation. Fi- nally, the factor causing the calculation value of obstacle height too small was analyzed, and the calculation method using energy e- quation is suggested.
分 类 号:TV131.4[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117