检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属太和医院,湖北十堰442000
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2014年第2期187-189,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的 :观察排刺温针配合超短波与药物治疗强直性脊柱炎的临床疗效差异。方法 :将116例强直性脊柱炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各58例,治疗组采用排刺温针配合超短波治疗;对照组采用口服药治疗,并在治疗3个疗程后进行疗效评定。结果 :治疗组显效率39.7%,总有效率为94.8%;对照组显效率13.8%,总有效率为67.2%,治疗组显效率及总有效率明显优于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :排刺温针配合超短波与药物治疗强直性脊柱炎均有效,但排刺温针配合超短波疗效更优,操作简单,无毒副作用,值得临床推广应用。Objective: To observe the clinical curative effect differences between row acupuncture and warm needling with ultrashort wave and drug treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: 116 patients with ankylosirig spondylitis were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, fifty-eight patients in each group. The treatment group used row acupuncture and warm needling with ultrashort wave therapy. The control group used the oral medicine treatment. After three course, the curative effect was evaluated. Results: The treatment group's efficiency was 39.7% and the total effective rate was 94.8%. The control group's efficiency was 13.8% and the total effective rate was 67.2%. The treatment group was obviously superior to the control group, and the difference between the two groups had statistical significance (P〈0.05 ). Conclusion: The row acupuncture and warm needling with ultrashort wave and drug treatment of ankylosing spondylitis are effective. But row acupuncture and warm needling with ultrashort wave have better curative effect, and the operation is simple with non-toxic side effects. It is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30