检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省滕州市中心人民医院,山东滕州277500
出 处:《中国医药导报》2014年第4期146-151,共6页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的 探讨新型鼻腔清洗器治疗慢性鼻炎鼻窦炎的临床效果.方法 选择滕州市中心人民医院2008年9月~2012年9月慢性鼻炎鼻窦炎患者110例,分为试验组及对照组.试验组用鼻可乐新型鼻腔清洗器和洁疗液进行鼻腔清洗,对照组患者用瑜伽壶和生理盐水进行鼻腔清洗.对两组的以下指标进行观察比较:①疗效;②糖精钠廓清试验;③食用醋嗅觉敏感性试验;④清洗期间口服用药种类和用药次数的变化;⑤上呼吸道感染发生频率.结果 ①疗效方面,冲洗治疗7d及8周后,试验组疗效均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).②食用醋嗅觉敏感性试验,8周后嗅觉改善程度试验组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05).③糖精钠廓清试验,两组冲洗治疗7d及8周后,糖精钠廓清时间试验组均显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).④用药种类、次数及上感频率,冲洗7d后用药种类、次数试验组较对照组明显减少;两组冲洗2个月,其间上呼吸道感染频率试验组较对照组明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05).结论 与瑜伽壶洗鼻器比较,鼻可乐新型鼻腔清洗器治疗慢性鼻炎鼻窦炎具有显著疗效.Objective To evaluate the effect of a new nasal irrigation system in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.Methods From September 2008 to September 2012,110 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis in Tengzhou Central People's Hospital were selected and divided into test group and control group.The test group was received nasal irrigation with Nasalcare and the control group was treated with Neti pot.Following items were observed and evaluated:①curative effect; ②saccharin sodium clearance test; ③olfactory sensitivity test; ④drug use during irrigation; ⑤frequency of upper respiratory infection.Results ①7 days and 8 weeks after nasal irrigation,the curative effect rate in test group was better than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).②The smell sense improvment of test group was better than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).③The time of saccharin sodium clearance 7 days and 8 weeks after the treatment in test group was shorter than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).④Drug kinds and frequency 7 days after the nasal irrigation in test group were all fewer than those in control group; frequency of upper respiratory tract infection in test group 2 months after the nasal irrigation was fewer than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion Nasalcare nasal irrigation has a significantly better curative effect on chronic rhinosinusitis.
分 类 号:R762[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3