检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵国彦[1] 唐洋[1] 刘志祥[1] 彭康[1] 徐欣[1] 申燕元
机构地区:[1]中南大学资源与安全工程学院,长沙410083
出 处:《科技导报》2014年第3期25-28,共4页Science & Technology Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51374244);国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAB02B03;2013BAB02B05;2012BAB08B01);中南大学教师基金项目(2013JSJJ029)
摘 要:为解决盛大铁矿低效开采的难题,运用改进的AHP-TOPSIS综合评价指标体系模型,对5个采矿方案进行综合评判优选。从经济、技术、安全3方面综合考虑影响采矿方法的评判指标,通过改进的层次分析法客观地确定各评判指标的权重向量,结合逼近理想解的排序法原理,构建改进的AHP-TOPSIS综合评判指标体系模型,基于评判指标计算出5种采矿方案的综合优越度。结果表明,5种采矿方案优越度依次为29%、28%、21%、22%、20%,其中分段接力退采分段充填采矿法为最优。In order to solve the mining technical problem of low exploitation in Shengda iron ore, an improved AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation index system model was established to evaluate t'ive kinds of mining methods. Considering the economy, teehnology and security, which impact the evaluation indexes of mining method, the weight matrix of' the evaluation indexes was established according to the improved AHP method, and then the improved AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model was established with the basic theory of TOPSIS. The degrees of mining method based on the comprehensive evaluation index were calculated. The results show that the synthetic superior degrees of the optional mining rnethods are 29%, 28%, 21%, 22%, 20%, and the first method named piecewise relay retrograded mining filling method is the optimal.
关 键 词:充填采矿法 AHP-TOPSIS 优越度
分 类 号:TD861.1[矿业工程—金属矿开采]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40